?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Keep your eye on the prize - Dan the Serene
November 18th, 2008
07:20 pm

[Link]

Previous Entry Share Next Entry
Keep your eye on the prize
A lot of people who oppose gay marriage seem to have no idea what is at stake. Some people seem to think there are one or two potential benefits that can largely be recreated ad hoc through simple contracts between the participants.

Wrong.

As I commented in someone else's journal as part of a related discussion (note that I totally threadjacked a post on property rights to get into this)

So "separate but equal" is good enough? Are you at all familiar with this study by the GAO?
http://www.gao.gov/archive/1997/og97016.pdf

It finds "1049 federal laws classified to the United States Code in which marital status is a factor."

The laws are broken down into 13 categories. "The order of the categories is not significant, except that the first four are those in which
marital status is most pervasive, and are the largest."

Social Security and Related Programs, Housing, and Food Stamps
Veterans' Benefits
Taxation
Federal Civilian and Military Service Benefits
Employment Benefits and Related Laws
Immigration, Naturalization, and Aliens
Indians
Trade, Commerce, and Intellectual Property
Financial Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Crimes and Family Violence
Loans, Guarantees, and Payments in Agriculture
Federal Natural Resources and Related Laws
Miscellaneous Laws

Good luck to anyone trying to "draw up their own roughly equivalent legal contracts on their own". Of course, many of the benefits of marriage come from outside the marriage itself, making the idea of recreating a marriage-like legal framework on an ad hoc basis all the more absurd.


That isn't 1049 marital benefits or privileges, it's 1049 related laws but a lot of them relate to benefits or privileges. It's an older study, but well worth the read.

(2 comments | Leave a comment)

Comments
 
[User Picture]
From:9thmoon
Date:November 19th, 2008 01:13 am (UTC)
(Link)
Separate but equal wasn't good enough for racial segregation. Why should it be good enough for marriage rights?
[User Picture]
From:dantheserene
Date:November 19th, 2008 01:17 am (UTC)
(Link)
that's why I used that expression. the other person mentioned the part about "draw up their own roughly equivalent legal contracts on their own".
Powered by LiveJournal.com