To everyone continuing to bleat about Stand your Ground in the Martin shooting:
Would it make any difference to your opinion to know that Stand your Ground was never raised in this case because it didn't apply? Even a rudimentary reading of the evidence would reveal this.
P.S. your picture of Martin is four or five years out of date. More current photos are readily available.
Just trying to help. I wouldn't want you to look like a blatant liar or an idiot, which are the only two possible conclusions available.